Home / Nuclear Analytical Chemistry · CHEM7012 / Chapter 01
Chapter 01 · Unit 1 · 15 syllabus hours

Nuclear Properties & Structure I

The nucleus as a physical object: the liquid drop model, the semi-empirical binding-energy equation and its mass-parabola applications, nuclear reactions — Q-value and cross section — compound-nucleus theory, angular momentum, dipole and quadrupole moments, parity, and nuclear size.

Semester VII CHEM7012 Nuclear Analytical 15 syllabus hours ≈ 35 min read 30 PYQs · solved exam favourites marked
Unit 1 · Nuclear Properties & Structure I Live

1 Chapter overview

This chapter treats the nucleus as a physical object — something with a size, a shape, a spin, a magnetic moment and a binding energy — and builds the two workhorse models you will use for the rest of the paper: the liquid-drop model (with its semi-empirical binding-energy equation) and the compound-nucleus picture of nuclear reactions. Everything here is examinable machinery: Q-values, cross sections, mass parabolas, Schmidt lines and quadrupole moments are the raw material of half the PYQs in this unit.

📊 Exam weight

30 PYQs (2020–2024) — the heaviest chapter in the paper. Five questions are on permanent repeat: the electron-cannot-live-in-the-nucleus proof (asked 6×), the Rutherford α-scattering numerical (3×), the positron threshold 2mₑ (4×), the (4n+1) artificial series (3×) and coal as nuclear fuel (3×). Every one of them is solved in §6. Learn the five derivations in §3 cold — they are the answers wearing different clothes.

Roadmap

  • §2 Concepts — the nucleus by the numbers (Z, A, N), nuclear size and the astonishing density that follows, binding energy, the liquid-drop picture, reaction Q-values and cross sections, Bohr's compound nucleus, fission energetics, spin/parity/moments, and what nuclear forces are actually like.
  • §3 Derivations — the semi-empirical binding-energy equation term by term, the mass parabola and the most-stable-Z rule, the Q-value formula, Rutherford scattering, and the quadrupole-moment integral (including the "spherical ⟹ Q = 0" proof the 2023 paper asked for).
  • §4–5 — five fully worked numericals and three figures (B/A curve, mass parabola, Rutherford geometry).
  • §6–8 — all 30 PYQs with year tags and full solutions, rapid-fire exam Q&A, and one-screen revision.

2 Core concepts

2.1 · The nuclear ledger: Z, A, N

A nucleus is fixed by two integers. Atomic number Z = number of protons (fixes the element). Mass number A = total nucleons. Neutron number N=A−ZN = A - Z. The standard symbol is ZAX^{A}_{Z}\mathrm{X}, e.g. ²³⁸₉₂U. Four words examiners love to interchange — don't let them:

TermSame …Different …Example
IsotopesZA (N differs)¹²₆C, ¹⁴₆C
IsobarsAZ⁴⁰₁₈Ar, ⁴⁰₁₉K, ⁴⁰₂₀Ca
IsotonesNZ, A¹³₆C, ¹⁴₇N (both N = 7)
IsomersZ, Aenergy state⁹⁹ᵐ₄₃Tc vs ground-state ⁹⁹₄₃Tc

2.2 · How big is a nucleus? How dense?

Electron-scattering and α-scattering measurements agree: nuclei are spheres whose volume is proportional to the number of nucleons — nuclear matter is incompressible, like a liquid. Hence the radius law

(R)R=R0A1/3,R0≈1.2 fmR = R_0 A^{1/3}, \qquad R_0 \approx 1.2\ \mathrm{fm}

with 1 fm=10−15 m1\ \mathrm{fm} = 10^{-15}\ \mathrm{m}. A uranium nucleus is only about 6× wider than a helium nucleus, because 2381/3≈6.2238^{1/3} \approx 6.2 while 41/3≈1.64^{1/3} \approx 1.6. Divide mass by volume and the A cancels — every nucleus has nearly the same density:

(ρ)ρ≈Au43πR03A≈2.3×1017 kg m−3\rho \approx \frac{A u}{\tfrac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3 A} \approx 2.3 \times 10^{17}\ \mathrm{kg\,m^{-3}}

That is ~1014 times the density of water — a teaspoon of nuclear matter would weigh ~1011 kg. This constancy is the experimental face of saturation: each nucleon binds only to its immediate neighbours, so adding nucleons adds volume, not density. (Worked in §4, Example 5.)

📌 Definition — rms radius

The root-mean-square radius ⟨r2⟩\sqrt{\langle r^2\rangle} is the charge-weighted average distance of protons from the centre, measured by electron scattering. For a uniform sphere it is 3/5 R≈0.775 R\sqrt{3/5}\,R \approx 0.775\,R; the syllabus phrase "nuclear size & rms radius" means: know R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, know R0≈1.2R_0 \approx 1.2 fm, and know the rms radius is the measured quantity behind it.

2.3 · Binding energy and mass defect

A nucleus weighs less than its separate nucleons. The missing mass — the mass defect Δm\Delta m — is the binding energy via E=Δm c2E = \Delta m\,c^2:

(B)B(Z,A)=[Zmp+(A−Z)mn−M(Z,A)] c2B(Z,A) = \big[Zm_p + (A-Z)m_n - M(Z,A)\big]\,c^2

Bigger B ⟹ more tightly bound ⟹ more stable. Per nucleon, B/A, tells you where energy can be released.

The B/A curve (Fig. 1, §5) climbs steeply to a broad maximum of ≈ 8.8 MeV per nucleon near A ≈ 56 (iron group), then falls slowly to ≈ 7.6 MeV at uranium. Two consequences run the whole subject:

  • Fusion (light nuclei combining, moving up the left slope toward iron) releases energy.
  • Fission (a heavy nucleus splitting, moving up the right slope toward iron) releases energy — about 200 MeV per fission of 235U^{235}\mathrm{U}.

2.4 · The liquid-drop model

Proposed by Gamow, made quantitative by Weizsäcker (1935) and Bethe: treat the nucleus as a drop of incompressible, uniformly dense nuclear fluid. Assumptions:

  • nuclear forces are short-ranged and saturating — each nucleon interacts only with neighbours (hence volume ∝ A, density constant);
  • the drop has a sharp surface with a surface tension;
  • protons repel by Coulomb's law across the whole drop (long range — the one non-saturating force).

It explains binding-energy systematics, fission (a drop splitting!), and α-decay energetics beautifully — and fails exactly where shell structure matters (magic numbers, spins, moments). The model is the semi-empirical equation of §3, derivation D1.

2.5 · Nuclear reactions: notation, Q-value, cross section

A reaction a+X→Y+ba + X \to Y + b is written X(a,b)YX(a,b)Y — e.g. Rutherford's 1919 transmutation 14N(α,p)17O^{14}\mathrm{N}(\alpha,p)^{17}\mathrm{O}. The Q-value is the net energy released:

📌 Definition — Q-value

Q=(mass of reactants−mass of products) c2=Tproducts−TreactantsQ = (\text{mass of reactants} - \text{mass of products})\,c^2 = T_{\text{products}} - T_{\text{reactants}}. Q > 0: exoergic (releases energy, always allowed). Q < 0: endoergic (needs a threshold kinetic energy). Computed from atomic masses in §3, D4 — including the famous 2mₑ positron threshold.

📌 Definition — cross section

For beam flux Φ\Phi (particles cm−2 s−1) hitting n target nuclei per cm3 in thickness x, the reaction rate per cm3 is R=n σ ΦR = n\,\sigma\,\Phi. So σ is an effective area per nucleus for the reaction — a probability wearing area units. Unit: the barn, 1 b=10−28 m2=10−24 cm21\ \mathrm{b} = 10^{-28}\ \mathrm{m^2} = 10^{-24}\ \mathrm{cm^2}. A large σ means "easy to hit". Cross sections are measured, tabulated per reaction and per energy — σ(n,γ), σ(n,α), σ(fission) etc.

2.6 · The compound nucleus (Bohr, 1936)

When a projectile enters a nucleus it does not knock out one nucleon and leave. Bohr's picture: the incoming energy is shared among all nucleons in ~10−22 s, forming a hot, excited compound nucleus that lives ~10−16–10−14 s — an eternity on nuclear timescales — and then decays. Two hallmarks examiners ask for:

  • Independence hypothesis: the decay of the compound nucleus forgets how it was formed — the same compound nucleus made two different ways decays identically (same branching ratios). Only conserved quantities (energy, angular momentum, parity) carry over.
  • Resonances: because the compound nucleus has discrete excited states, the cross section shows sharp peaks versus bombarding energy.

Qualitative only — no derivation is in the syllabus. Contrast with direct reactions (grazing, fast, forward-peaked) when a later chapter needs it.

2.7 · Fission probability from the binding-energy equation

The semi-empirical equation predicts fission energetics directly. Split 236U^{236}\mathrm{U} (the compound nucleus in 235U+n^{235}\mathrm{U} + n) into two A ≈ 118 fragments: each fragment's B/A≈8.5B/A \approx 8.5 MeV exceeds the parent's ≈ 7.6 MeV, so Q≈236×(8.5−7.6)≈200Q \approx 236 \times (8.5 - 7.6) \approx 200 MeV is liberated — mostly as fragment kinetic energy. The fissility parameter Z2/A measures Coulomb disruption versus surface-tension cohesion: fission barriers shrink as Z2/A grows, and vanish near Z2/A≈48Z^2/A \approx 48 (Bohr–Wheeler limit), beyond which nuclei fission spontaneously. That is why 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} (Z2/A≈35.6Z^2/A \approx 35.6) needs a fast neutron while 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} (≈36.0\approx 36.0, odd-N) fissions with thermal neutrons — and why superheavy nuclei are hard to make. "Fission probability" in the syllabus = this energetic argument plus the barrier picture, both rooted in the binding-energy equation.

🔥 Exam favourite

Fission/moderator/control-rod/reactor-diagram questions appeared in 2023 and 2024 back-to-back. The 200-MeV number, the chain-reaction idea, and the component functions (fuel, moderator, control rods, coolant) are solved in §6 — memorise them as one block.

2.8 · Spin and parity

Each nucleon carries orbital angular momentum l\mathbf{l} and spin s=12\mathbf{s} = \tfrac{1}{2}. The nuclear spin I is the total angular momentum of the nucleus in units of ħ:

  • even-even nuclei (even Z, even N): ground state always I=0I = 0 — nucleons pair off, angular momenta cancel;
  • odd-A nuclei: I half-integer (12,32,…\tfrac{1}{2}, \tfrac{3}{2}, \ldots) — set by the last unpaired nucleon;
  • odd-odd nuclei: I integer (nonzero) — the odd proton and odd neutron couple.

Parity π is the eigenvalue (±1) of the wavefunction under spatial inversion r→−r\mathbf{r} \to -\mathbf{r}. For one nucleon in orbital l, π=(−1)l\pi = (-1)^l; for the nucleus, π=(−1)∑li\pi = (-1)^{\sum l_i} — even sum ⟹ π=+1\pi = +1, odd ⟹ π=−1\pi = -1. States are labelled IπI^\pi, e.g. 0+0^+ for every even-even ground state. Parity is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions (not in weak) — selection rules for γ-transitions and β-decay use it constantly.

2.9 · Magnetic dipole moment and the Schmidt lines

The proton's orbital motion and both nucleons' spins make the nucleus a tiny magnet. Measured in nuclear magnetons μN=eℏ/2mp\mu_N = e\hbar/2m_p. The Schmidt (single-particle) model assumes the whole moment comes from the last odd nucleon; the proton contributes orbital (glp=1g_l^p = 1) plus spin (gsp=5.585g_s^p = 5.585), the neutron only spin (gsn=−3.826g_s^n = -3.826, gln=0g_l^n = 0). For an odd nucleon with orbital l and total j=l±12j = l \pm \tfrac{1}{2}:

j=l+12j = l + \tfrac{1}{2}j=l−12j = l - \tfrac{1}{2}
odd protonμ=l+2.79\mu = l + 2.79μ=l−2.79 ll+1\mu = l - \dfrac{2.79\,l}{l+1}
odd neutronμ=−1.91\mu = -1.91μ=+1.91 ll+1\mu = +\dfrac{1.91\,l}{l+1}

Values in μN\mu_N. Plotted against j these give the two Schmidt lines; real moments scatter between the lines (configuration mixing, meson currents) but rarely far outside — the lines are the model's prediction and its test.

2.10 · Electric quadrupole moment: shape detector

A non-spherical charge distribution has an electric quadrupole moment Q — the observable that reports nuclear deformation:

📌 Definition — quadrupole moment

Q=1e∫(3z2−r2) ρ(r) dτQ = \tfrac{1}{e}\int (3z^2 - r^2)\,\rho(\mathbf{r})\,d\tau, the charge-weighted elongation along the spin axis. Q=0Q = 0: spherical. Q>0Q > 0: prolate (cigar — stretched along the axis). Q<0Q < 0: oblate (disc — squashed). Proof of the spherical case and the ellipsoid formula are derivation D6 in §3 — the 2023 paper asked exactly this.

2.11 · The nature of nuclear forces

What holds the drop together against Coulomb repulsion (a 2023 PYQ — answer as a list, each point one line):

  • Short range — effective only over ~1–2 fm, then falls exponentially (Yukawa form e−μr/re^{-\mu r}/r); negligible beyond a few fm.
  • Strongly attractive at ~1 fm — ~50× stronger than the Coulomb repulsion it overcomes.
  • Saturating — each nucleon binds only to neighbours (the reason density is constant and B∝AB \propto A).
  • Charge independent — p–p, n–n and p–n forces are essentially identical (isospin symmetry); the slight extra p–n attraction is the asymmetry term's origin.
  • Spin dependent — the triplet (parallel-spin) p–n force binds the deuteron; the singlet does not bind.
  • Repulsive core — below ~0.5 fm the force turns hard-repulsive (nuclei don't collapse).
  • Non-central (tensor) component — depends on the orientation of spins relative to the separation vector (gives the deuteron its quadrupole moment).
  • Exchange character — described as meson exchange (Yukawa's pion, 1935); at a deeper level, residual colour forces between quarks.

3 Key derivations

Five boxed results. Each is derived, not quoted — the derivation is the exam answer.

D1 · The semi-empirical binding-energy equation (Weizsäcker–Bethe)

🧪 Derivation

Start from the liquid drop: binding energy = bulk cohesion of A nucleons, minus corrections. Volume: each interior nucleon contributes av → +avA+a_v A. Surface: surface nucleons have fewer neighbours; deficit ∝ surface area 4πR2=4πR02A2/34\pi R^2 = 4\pi R_0^2 A^{2/3} → −asA2/3-a_s A^{2/3}. Coulomb: energy of Z charges on a sphere, 35(Ze)2/4πε0R\tfrac{3}{5}(Ze)^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0 R, with Z(Z−1)Z(Z-1) pairs and R∝A1/3R \propto A^{1/3} → −acZ(Z−1)/A1/3-a_c Z(Z-1)/A^{1/3}. Asymmetry: Pauli principle forces excess neutrons (or protons) into higher Fermi levels; the penalty ∝ (excess)2/A → −asym(A−2Z)2/A-a_{\mathrm{sym}}(A-2Z)^2/A. Pairing: nucleons gain extra binding in spin-paired couples → ±δ\pm\delta, + for even-even, − for odd-odd, 0 for odd A.

(1)B(Z,A)=avA−asA2/3−acZ(Z−1)A1/3−asym(A−2Z)2A±δB(Z,A) = a_v A - a_s A^{2/3} - a_c\frac{Z(Z-1)}{A^{1/3}} - a_{\mathrm{sym}}\frac{(A-2Z)^2}{A} \pm \delta
TermCoefficient (MeV)Physical meaning
Volume +avA+a_vAav≈15.8a_v \approx 15.8Bulk cohesion; saturating short-range force — each interior nucleon adds the same binding.
Surface −asA2/3-a_sA^{2/3}as≈17.8a_s \approx 17.8Surface nucleons are under-bound; penalty ∝ surface area.
Coulomb −acZ(Z−1)/A1/3-a_cZ(Z-1)/A^{1/3}ac≈0.71a_c \approx 0.71Proton–proton repulsion over the whole drop; the only long-range (non-saturating) term — it is what ultimately limits nuclear size.
Asymmetry −asym(A−2Z)2/A-a_{\mathrm{sym}}(A-2Z)^2/Aasym≈23.7a_{\mathrm{sym}} \approx 23.7Pauli/Fermi-gas penalty for N ≠ Z; favours N ≈ Z but is overruled by Coulomb in heavy nuclei (hence neutron excess grows with A).
Pairing ±δ\pm\deltaδ≈12A−1/2\delta \approx 12A^{-1/2}Extra binding for paired nucleons: + even-even, − odd-odd, 0 odd-A. Explains why even-even nuclei dominate the stable list.
⚠️ Coefficient values differ between fits

Sources quote slightly different sets — e.g. (15.75, 17.8, 0.711, 23.7) from Evans/Krane-style fits vs (15.8, 18.3, 0.72, 23.2) from Wapstra-type fits — and the pairing term as ±12A−1/2\pm 12A^{-1/2} or ±33A−3/4\pm 33A^{-3/4} MeV (numerically close). Use one consistent set in a calculation and say which. The equation misses shell effects: it under-binds doubly-magic nuclei such as 4He^{4}\mathrm{He} and over-smooths magic-number dips — that failure is itself an exam point.

D2 · Mass parabola and the most stable isobar

🧪 Derivation

Write the atomic mass from (1): M(Z,A)c2=ZMHc2+(A−Z)mnc2−B(Z,A)M(Z,A)c^2 = ZM_Hc^2 + (A-Z)m_nc^2 - B(Z,A). Collecting powers of Z, the Z-dependent part is quadratic: M(Z,A)=C0+C1Z+C2Z2M(Z,A) = C_0 + C_1 Z + C_2 Z^2 (the Z2Z^2 pieces come from the Coulomb and asymmetry terms). A quadratic in Z is a parabola; its minimum, dM/dZ=0dM/dZ = 0, is the most stable isobar:

(2)Z0≈A2+0.015 A2/3Z_0 \approx \frac{A}{2 + 0.015\,A^{2/3}}

Most stable Z for mass number A. For light nuclei Z0≈A/2Z_0 \approx A/2; Coulomb drags it below A/2 as A grows.

🔑 One parabola or two?

Odd A: pairing term is zero for every isobar → one parabola; only the minimum isobar is stable, neighbours β-decay toward it. Even A: even-even isobars sit on a lower parabola, odd-odd on an upper one, split by 2δ2\delta → several isobars can be simultaneously stable, and odd-odd isobars always have a lower even-even neighbour to decay to. This is the entire logic behind the 2024 stability-order PYQ and the "no stable odd-odd after 14N^{14}\mathrm{N}" PYQ (both solved in §6).

D3 · The Q-value formula

🧪 Derivation

Total energy is conserved: rest energies + kinetic energies before = after. The kinetic-energy change is the rest-mass change:

(3)Q=(mreactants−mproducts) c2=Tproducts−TreactantsQ = \big(m_{\mathrm{reactants}} - m_{\mathrm{products}}\big)\,c^2 = T_{\mathrm{products}} - T_{\mathrm{reactants}}

Use atomic masses (tables give those) — electron masses cancel as long as charge balances, except in β⁺ decay: the daughter atom has one fewer electron while a positron is also emitted, leaving a net 2me2m_e (see the 2022/2024 PYQ solutions). Q>0Q > 0 exoergic; Q<0Q < 0 endoergic with lab threshold Ethr=−Q (1+mproj/Mtarget)E_{\mathrm{thr}} = -Q\,(1 + m_{\mathrm{proj}}/M_{\mathrm{target}}) — the extra factor feeds the recoiling compound system, which keeps no kinetic energy for the products.

D4 · Rutherford scattering

🧪 Derivation (sketch)

An α-particle (Z1=2Z_1 = 2) in the Coulomb field of a nucleus (Z2) follows a hyperbola. Angular-momentum + energy conservation give the impact parameter b=kZ1Z2e22Ecot⁡θ2b = \tfrac{kZ_1Z_2e^2}{2E}\cot\tfrac{\theta}{2} with k=1/4πε0k = 1/4\pi\varepsilon_0. Particles with impact parameters in 2πb db2\pi b\,db scatter into 2πsin⁡θ dθ2\pi\sin\theta\,d\theta; the ratio is the differential cross section:

(4)dσdΩ=(Z1Z2e216πε0E)2csc⁡4 ⁣(θ2)\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \left(\frac{Z_1 Z_2 e^2}{16\pi\varepsilon_0 E}\right)^2 \csc^4\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)

Rutherford formula. ke2=1.44k e^2 = 1.44 MeV·fm is the number to memorise.

For a head-on collision (θ=180∘\theta = 180^\circ, csc⁡490∘=1\csc^4 90^\circ = 1), all kinetic energy becomes Coulomb potential at the distance of closest approach:

(5)dmin⁡=14πε0 Z1Z2e2Ed_{\min} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{Z_1 Z_2 e^2}{E}

Compare with R1+R2R_1 + R_2: if dmin⁡≫R1+R2d_{\min} \gg R_1+R_2 the scattering is pure Coulomb (no nuclear contact) — the regime of every PYQ numerical here.

D5 · Quadrupole moment: the integral and the spherical proof

🧪 Derivation

The (spectroscopic) quadrupole moment is the l=2l = 2 multipole of the charge distribution about the spin (z) axis:

(6)Q=1e∫(3z2−r2) ρ(r) dτQ = \frac{1}{e}\int (3z^2 - r^2)\,\rho(\mathbf{r})\,d\tau

With ρ the charge density. Sign convention: prolate ⟹ Q > 0, oblate ⟹ Q < 0.

Spherical ⟹ Q = 0 (the 2023 PYQ). For a spherically symmetric charge distribution, no direction is special: ⟨x2⟩=⟨y2⟩=⟨z2⟩=13⟨r2⟩\langle x^2\rangle = \langle y^2\rangle = \langle z^2\rangle = \tfrac{1}{3}\langle r^2\rangle. Then 3⟨z2⟩−⟨r2⟩=3⋅13⟨r2⟩−⟨r2⟩=03\langle z^2\rangle - \langle r^2\rangle = 3\cdot\tfrac{1}{3}\langle r^2\rangle - \langle r^2\rangle = 0, so the integral vanishes identically. Non-zero Q requires deformation: for a uniform ellipsoid with symmetry-axis semi-axis a and transverse semi-axis b, Q=25Z(a2−b2)Q = \tfrac{2}{5}Z(a^2 - b^2) — prolate (a>ba > b) gives Q > 0 (e.g. most deformed rare earths), oblate (a<ba < b) gives Q < 0. A measured Q ≠ 0 is therefore direct evidence that the nucleus is not spherical — the liquid drop's one shape assumption breaking down, which is why deformed nuclei need the collective model.

4 Worked examples

Every number below is computed from scratch — follow the arithmetic, then cover it and redo it. That is the whole game.

Example 1 · Binding energy of 56Fe^{56}\mathrm{Fe} from the semi-empirical equation

Identify: Z=26Z = 26, A=56A = 56 (even-even → pairing +). Coefficients (MeV): av=15.75a_v = 15.75, as=17.8a_s = 17.8, ac=0.71a_c = 0.71, asym=23.7a_{sym} = 23.7, δ=+12A−1/2\delta = +12A^{-1/2}.

Volume: 15.75×56=882.015.75 \times 56 = 882.0 MeV. With 561/3=3.82656^{1/3} = 3.826, 562/3=14.6456^{2/3} = 14.64: surface =17.8×14.64=260.6= 17.8 \times 14.64 = 260.6 MeV.

Coulomb: 0.71×26×25/3.826=120.60.71 \times 26 \times 25 / 3.826 = 120.6 MeV. Asymmetry: (56−52)2/56=0.2857(56-52)^2/56 = 0.2857, 23.7×0.2857=6.7723.7 \times 0.2857 = 6.77 MeV. Pairing: +12/56=+1.60+12/\sqrt{56} = +1.60 MeV.

B=882.0−260.6−120.6−6.77+1.60=495.6B = 882.0 - 260.6 - 120.6 - 6.77 + 1.60 = 495.6 MeV; B/A=495.6/56=8.85B/A = 495.6/56 = 8.85 MeV. Measured: 492.3 MeV (8.79 MeV/nucleon) — the formula is within ~1%. The peak of the B/A curve is no accident: it is where volume cohesion wins before Coulomb takes over.

Example 2 · Q-value of 14N(α,p)17O^{14}\mathrm{N}(\alpha,p)^{17}\mathrm{O}

Atomic masses (u): 14N=14.003074^{14}\mathrm{N} = 14.003074, α=4.002603\alpha = 4.002603, 17O=16.999132^{17}\mathrm{O} = 16.999132, p=1.007825p = 1.007825.

Reactants: 14.003074+4.002603=18.00567714.003074 + 4.002603 = 18.005677 u. Products: 16.999132+1.007825=18.00695716.999132 + 1.007825 = 18.006957 u.

Q=(18.005677−18.006957)×931.5=−0.001280×931.5=−1.19Q = (18.005677 - 18.006957) \times 931.5 = -0.001280 \times 931.5 = -1.19 MeV. Endoergic: Rutherford needed α-particles above the lab threshold Ethr=1.19(1+4/14)=1.53E_{thr} = 1.19(1 + 4/14) = 1.53 MeV — his 7.7 MeV α's from 214Po^{214}\mathrm{Po} qualified easily.

Example 3 · Rutherford fraction at 180° (2020 PYQ)

Head-on ⟹ θ=180∘\theta = 180^\circ, csc⁡490∘=1\csc^4 90^\circ = 1. With ke2=1.44ke^2 = 1.44 MeV·fm: dσ/dΩ=(1.44×2×79/(4×6.0))2=(9.48)2=89.9d\sigma/d\Omega = (1.44 \times 2 \times 79 / (4 \times 6.0))^2 = (9.48)^2 = 89.9 fm2 =8.99×10−25= 8.99 \times 10^{-25} cm2.

Target nuclei per unit area: nt=ρtNA/Ar=19.8×10−5×6.022×1023/197=6.05×1017nt = \rho t N_A/A_r = 19.8 \times 10^{-5} \times 6.022 \times 10^{23}/197 = 6.05 \times 10^{17} cm−2.

Fraction per unit area at r=12.0r = 12.0 cm: nt (dσ/dΩ)/r2=6.05×1017×8.99×10−25/144=3.78×10−9nt\,(d\sigma/d\Omega)/r^2 = 6.05 \times 10^{17} \times 8.99 \times 10^{-25}/144 = 3.78 \times 10^{-9} cm−2. About 4 α-particles per 109 incident per cm2 of screen — backscattering is rare, which is why Rutherford needed a dark room and patience.

Example 4 · Closest approach of a 5.5 MeV α to Au (2024 PYQ)

dmin=kZ1Z2e2/E=1.44×2×79/5.5=227.5/5.5=41.4d_{min} = kZ_1Z_2e^2/E = 1.44 \times 2 \times 79/5.5 = 227.5/5.5 = 41.4 fm =4.14×10−14= 4.14 \times 10^{-14} m.

Sanity check: RAu+Rα=1.2(1971/3+41/3)=1.2(5.82+1.59)=8.9R_{Au} + R_\alpha = 1.2(197^{1/3} + 4^{1/3}) = 1.2(5.82 + 1.59) = 8.9 fm ≪ 41.4 fm — the α never touches nuclear matter, so pure Coulomb scattering (eq. 4) applies.

Example 5 · Radius and density of the gold nucleus

R=1.2×1971/3=1.2×5.82=6.98R = 1.2 \times 197^{1/3} = 1.2 \times 5.82 = 6.98 fm ≈ 7.0 fm.

Density: mass 197×1.6605×10−27=3.27×10−25197 \times 1.6605 \times 10^{-27} = 3.27 \times 10^{-25} kg in volume 43π(6.98×10−15)3=1.42×10−42\tfrac{4}{3}\pi(6.98 \times 10^{-15})^3 = 1.42 \times 10^{-42} m3 gives ρ=2.3×1017\rho = 2.3 \times 10^{17} kg m−3 — the A cancels, so all nuclei share this density (saturation).

5 Figures

Binding energy per nucleon versus mass number Curve of B over A against A: steep rise to a maximum of about 8.8 MeV near A = 56 (iron), slow fall to about 7.6 MeV at uranium. Arrows show fusion (light nuclei) and fission (heavy nuclei) both releasing energy by moving toward iron. 060120180240 mass number A 2468 B/A (MeV per nucleon) ⁴He¹²C⁵⁶Fe (max)²³⁸U fusion →← fission both release energy moving toward iron B/A (measured) key nuclei
Fig. 1. Binding energy per nucleon vs mass number. The peak near ⁵⁶Fe is why light nuclei fuse and heavy nuclei fission — both move up the curve.
Mass parabola for the A = 40 isobars Two parabolas of atomic mass versus Z for A = 40: the lower even-even parabola holds 40Ar and 40Ca, the upper odd-odd parabola holds 40K, split by twice the pairing energy. Arrows show 40K beta-minus decaying to 40Ca and electron-capturing to 40Ar. 1819202122 atomic number Z (A = 40) relative atomic mass → ⁴⁰Ar⁴⁰Ca⁴⁰K ⁴⁰Sc β⁻ EC 2δ split even–even (lower) odd–odd (upper) ⁴⁰K must decay: an even–even neighbour is always lower
Fig. 2. Mass parabola for the even-A isobars A = 40. Pairing splits even–even (⁴⁰Ar, ⁴⁰Ca — stable) from odd–odd (⁴⁰K — must β⁻/EC decay). Odd A gives a single parabola instead.
Rutherford scattering geometry An alpha particle approaches a gold nucleus with impact parameter b, follows a hyperbolic trajectory around it, and leaves at scattering angle theta to its original direction. The distance of closest approach d-min is marked between the nucleus and the vertex of the hyperbola. nucleus, Ze α-particle, E b b = impact parameter θ dmin hyperbolic trajectory undeflected asymptote θ from Rutherford eq. (4); dmin from eq. (5)
Fig. 3. Rutherford geometry: impact parameter b, scattering angle θ, and distance of closest approach dmin — the three quantities in every α-scattering numerical.

6 PYQ bank

All 30 Ch-1 questions from Burdwan M.Sc. papers 2020–2024 (MSCH-102 / MCHEM-0102), each with year tags and a full worked solution. Identical repeats across the two 2020 papers are merged into single cards.

🔥 Exam favourite — the big five

Electron-in-nucleus (6×) · Rutherford numerical (3×) · positron 2mₑ threshold (4×) · (4n+1) artificial series (3×) · coal as nuclear fuel (3×). If you can answer these five cold, you own this chapter's PYQ bank.

2020 · MSCH-1022020 · MCHEM-0102electron: asked 6×coal: asked 3×

(a) Considering the wave nature of electron, establish that it cannot be placed inside the nucleus. (b) Coal is a widely employed fuel but cannot be used as nuclear fuel — why?

(a) Confining an electron to nuclear dimensions (Δx∼10−14\Delta x \sim 10^{-14} m) gives, by Heisenberg, Δp≳ℏ/2Δx=5.3×10−21\Delta p \gtrsim \hbar/2\Delta x = 5.3 \times 10^{-21} kg m s−1. It is relativistic, so E≈pc=1.58×10−12 J≈10E \approx pc = 1.58 \times 10^{-12}\ \mathrm{J} \approx 10 MeV — far above its 0.511 MeV rest energy. Equivalently by de Broglie: an electron with a typical β-decay energy (~1 MeV) has wavelength λ=h/p≈870\lambda = h/p \approx 870 fm, ~100× the nuclear diameter — the wave simply does not fit. Yet electrons emitted in β-decay carry ≤ ~1–2 MeV. An electron needing ~10 MeV just to exist inside the nucleus contradicts every β-spectrum ever measured — so no electron resides in the nucleus; β-electrons are created at emission (n→p+e−+νˉen \to p + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e).

(b) Burning coal is chemistry: rearranging electron bonds, ~4 eV per CO2 formed. Nuclear fuel must release nuclear binding energy (~200 MeV per fission, ~107× more) via a self-sustaining chain reaction in fissile nuclides (235U^{235}\mathrm{U}, 239Pu^{239}\mathrm{Pu}). Coal contains only ~1–3 ppm uranium (overwhelmingly non-fissile 238U^{238}\mathrm{U}) — no fissile inventory, no chain reaction, no nuclear energy. (Its trace radioactivity is actually a pollution problem, not a fuel reserve.)

2020 · MSCH-1022020 · MCHEM-0102asked 3×

(a) What fraction of α-particles of kinetic energy 6.0 MeV will fall per unit area on a screen 12.0 cm away from a gold (¹⁹⁷₇₉Au) foil of 1×10−5 cm thickness for a head-on collision? (Density of gold = 19.8 g mL−1.) (b) Why is the (4n+1) series called the artificial series?

(a) Head-on ⟹ θ=180∘\theta = 180^\circ in eq. (4): dσ/dΩ=(ke2Z1Z2/4E)2=(1.44×2×79/24)2=89.9d\sigma/d\Omega = (ke^2 Z_1Z_2/4E)^2 = (1.44 \times 2 \times 79/24)^2 = 89.9 fm2 =8.99×10−25= 8.99 \times 10^{-25} cm2. Nuclei per unit area: nt=19.8×10−5×6.022×1023/197=6.05×1017nt = 19.8 \times 10^{-5} \times 6.022 \times 10^{23}/197 = 6.05 \times 10^{17} cm−2. Fraction per unit area = nt(dσ/dΩ)/r2=6.05×1017×8.99×10−25/122=3.8×10−9nt(d\sigma/d\Omega)/r^2 = 6.05 \times 10^{17} \times 8.99 \times 10^{-25}/12^2 = 3.8 \times 10^{-9} cm−2. (Full steps in §4, Example 3.)

(b) The four decay series are 4n (232Th^{232}\mathrm{Th}), 4n+2 (238U^{238}\mathrm{U}), 4n+3 (235U^{235}\mathrm{U}) and 4n+1 (neptunium, 237Np^{237}\mathrm{Np}). The first three have parents with half-lives comparable to Earth's age (108–1010 yr) and survive in nature; 237Np^{237}\mathrm{Np} has t1/2=2.1×106t_{1/2} = 2.1 \times 10^6 yr ≪ 4.5×109 yr, so every primordial atom decayed away long ago. The series exists today only when made artificially (e.g. 238U(n,2n)237U→237Np^{238}\mathrm{U}(n,2n)^{237}\mathrm{U} \to ^{237}\mathrm{Np}) — hence "artificial".

2020 · MCHEM-0102asked 2×

(a) Why does 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} emit α-particles instead of individual protons and neutrons? (b) State the significant difference between X-rays and γ-rays.

(a) Energetics. 238U→234Th+α^{238}\mathrm{U} \to ^{234}\mathrm{Th} + \alpha: Q=(238.050788−234.043601−4.002603)×931.5=+4.27Q = (238.050788 - 234.043601 - 4.002603) \times 931.5 = +4.27 MeV — allowed, because the α-particle is extraordinarily tightly bound (28.3 MeV total, 7.07 MeV/nucleon), which pays for the emission. Knocking out a single proton or neutron costs its separation energy (~6–8 MeV) with no such payback ⟹ Q<0Q < 0, forbidden. The nucleus takes the decay path that releases energy.

(b)

X-raysγ-rays
Origin: electron transitions (atomic shells) or bremsstrahlungOrigin: nuclear de-excitation (nucleus dropping between energy levels)
Typically eV–~100 keVTypically ~10 keV–several MeV
Emitted when a vacancy is created in an inner shell (e.g. after EC)Emitted by excited nuclei (e.g. 60Co^{60}\mathrm{Co}, 137Cs^{137}\mathrm{Cs})

The distinction is origin, not energy — the ranges overlap.

2021 · MSCH-102electron: asked 6×

Is it possible to house the electron inside the nucleus? Defend your answer.

No. Uncertainty principle: Δx∼10−14\Delta x \sim 10^{-14} m ⟹ Δp≳5×10−21\Delta p \gtrsim 5 \times 10^{-21} kg m s−1 ⟹ E≈pc≈10E \approx pc \approx 10 MeV — an order of magnitude above the largest β-decay energies (~1–3 MeV). A nuclear electron would also give nuclei the wrong spin/magnetic moment systematics. β-electrons are created at the instant of decay, not stored inside. (Full numbers in the 2020 card above.)

2021 · MSCH-102

Write down the isolation process of polonium from pitchblende, mentioning the chemistry of every step.

Pitchblende (uraninite, UO2) holds 210Po^{210}\mathrm{Po} (t1/2=138t_{1/2} = 138 d) as a daughter of the 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} series (via 210Pb→210Bi→210Po^{210}\mathrm{Pb} \to ^{210}\mathrm{Bi} \to ^{210}\mathrm{Po}), at only ~100 µg per ton of ore — the Curies' 1898 problem.

Acid digestion — the ore is dissolved in hot mineral acid, bringing U, Pb, Bi, Po and the active substance into solution; radioactivity is tracked at every step (the Curies' guiding principle).

Sulfide-group precipitation — passing H2S through the acidic solution precipitates PbS, Bi2S3, CuS…; polonium follows bismuth (Po is a chalcogen, group 16, analytically Bi-like) and co-precipitates with the Bi2S3 fraction, while U and Th stay in solution.

Separation from bismuth — fractional precipitation / sublimation progressively enriches Po away from Bi (the Curies reached activities hundreds of times that of uranium this way).

Spontaneous (electrochemical) deposition — the modern finish: Po4+ in dilute HCl deposits spontaneously on a less-noble metal disc (Ag, Ni), giving an essentially pure, weighable 210Po^{210}\mathrm{Po} source; heating the sulfide to ~500 °C in vacuo also decomposes it to pure Po metal by sublimation.

2022 · MSCH-102electron: asked 6×

Considering the wave nature and particle nature of electron, establish that it cannot be contained in the nucleus.

Wave nature: a ~1 MeV electron (typical β energy) has de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p=hc/E2−me2c4≈870\lambda = h/p = hc/\sqrt{E^2 - m_e^2c^4} \approx 870 fm — roughly a hundred nuclear diameters. A wave that large cannot be localised inside a ~10 fm nucleus. Particle nature: Heisenberg confinement to Δx∼10−14\Delta x \sim 10^{-14} m demands E≈pc≈10E \approx pc \approx 10 MeV (computed in the 2020 card), contradicting measured β-spectra (endpoint energies ~0.5–3 MeV). Both natures agree: the electron is not a nuclear constituent.

2022 · MSCH-102

In the mirror pair 7Li^{7}\mathrm{Li}–7Be^{7}\mathrm{Be}, the isobar masses are 7.01600 and 7.01693 amu respectively. Predict which is unstable, calculate the disintegration energy, and sketch the energy spectrum of the emitted particle.

Prediction: the heavier isobar is unstable — 7Be^{7}\mathrm{Be} (7.01693 u > 7.01600 u) decays to 7Li^{7}\mathrm{Li}. Disintegration energy: Q=(7.01693−7.01600)×931.5=0.00093×931.5=0.87Q = (7.01693 - 7.01600) \times 931.5 = 0.00093 \times 931.5 = 0.87 MeV. The mode is K-electron capture (Q<1.022Q < 1.022 MeV forbids β+): 7Be+eK−→7Li+νe^{7}\mathrm{Be} + e^-_K \to ^{7}\mathrm{Li} + \nu_e. Spectrum: no charged particle is emitted — EC is a two-body decay, so the neutrino is monoenergetic (invisible in practice); the observable spectrum is a single sharp γ-line at 0.48 MeV from the 89.6% branch to the excited 7Li∗^{7}\mathrm{Li}^* state (10.4% goes to the ground state, neutrino carries the full 0.87 MeV). Sketch: one narrow peak at 0.48 MeV on the energy axis — not a continuous β-spectrum.

2022 · MSCH-102asked 2×

Why does 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} emit α-particles but not individual protons and neutrons?

Same energetics as the 2020 card: α-emission has Q=+4.27Q = +4.27 MeV because the α-particle's 28.3 MeV binding energy subsidises the decay; single-nucleon emission costs ~6–8 MeV separation energy with Q<0Q < 0. Nuclei decay only along energetically open channels.

2022 · MSCH-102coal: asked 3×

Why can't coal be used as nuclear fuel?

Coal releases chemical energy (~4 eV per CO2); nuclear fuel must release nuclear binding energy (~200 MeV per fission) through a sustained chain reaction in fissile material. Coal's ~ppm uranium is essentially all non-fissile 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} — no fissile inventory, no chain reaction. See the full 2020 answer.

2022 · MSCH-102asked 4×

Why is the threshold energy for positron emission equal to 2mₑ?

Write β+ decay with atomic masses (what tables list). Nuclear decay: mnuc(Z,A)→mnuc(Z−1,A)+me+⋯m_{nuc}(Z,A) \to m_{nuc}(Z-1,A) + m_e + \cdots. Atomic mass = nuclear mass + Zmₑ, so Q=[Matom(Z,A)−Zme−(Matom(Z−1,A)−(Z−1)me)−me]c2=[Matom(Z,A)−Matom(Z−1,A)−2me]c2Q = [M_{atom}(Z,A) - Zm_e - (M_{atom}(Z-1,A) - (Z-1)m_e) - m_e]c^2 = [M_{atom}(Z,A) - M_{atom}(Z-1,A) - 2m_e]c^2. The 2mₑ = one positron mass + one electron mass (the daughter atom has one fewer electron than the parent atom). Hence β+ needs ΔM>2me\Delta M > 2m_e, i.e. 1.022 MeV — while electron capture, Q=[Matom(Z,A)−Matom(Z−1,A)]c2Q = [M_{atom}(Z,A) - M_{atom}(Z-1,A)]c^2, pays no such tax and wins whenever both compete.

2023 · MSCH-102fission block: asked 2 yrs running

How can a fission reaction be exploited in harnessing nuclear energy?

Each 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} fission liberates ~200 MeV (fragment kinetic energy ~168 MeV + neutrons + γ + decay heat ≈ 195 MeV recoverable; ~11 MeV escapes as neutrinos) — about 107× a chemical bond. Crucially it also releases 2–3 new neutrons, which fission further 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} nuclei: a chain reaction. Hold the neutron multiplication factor at exactly k = 1 (critical) and the ~200 MeV per fission appears as steady heat — carried by coolant to raise steam and drive turbines. That controlled chain reaction is the nuclear reactor (see the 2024 diagram card).

2023 · MSCH-102fission block: asked 2 yrs running

Narrate with suitable examples the role of moderators and control rods in a nuclear reactor.

ComponentRoleExamples
ModeratorSlows fast fission neutrons (~2 MeV) to thermal energies (~0.025 eV) by elastic collisions, where the 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} fission cross section is hundreds of barns — without it the chain reaction diesLight water (H2O), heavy water (D2O), graphite
Control rodsStrong neutron absorbers, inserted/withdrawn to hold k = 1: push in to throttle the reaction (or scram it), pull out to raise powerCadmium, boron (as B4C), hafnium

Moderator = accelerator pedal (makes neutrons useful); control rods = brake pedal (eats the surplus neutrons). Coolant (H2O, He, liquid Na) then carries the heat out.

2023 · MSCH-102asked 3×

What fraction of α-particles of K.E. 4.5 MeV will be registered per unit area on a screen placed 10 cm away from a gold foil of 1×10−5 cm thickness? (Density of gold: 19.8 g mL−1.)

Same machinery as the 2020 numerical, new numbers: dσ/dΩ=(1.44×2×79/(4×4.5))2=(12.64)2=159.8d\sigma/d\Omega = (1.44 \times 2 \times 79/(4 \times 4.5))^2 = (12.64)^2 = 159.8 fm2 =1.60×10−24= 1.60 \times 10^{-24} cm2; nt=6.05×1017nt = 6.05 \times 10^{17} cm−2 (same foil). Fraction per unit area = 6.05×1017×1.60×10−24/102=9.7×10−96.05 \times 10^{17} \times 1.60 \times 10^{-24}/10^2 = 9.7 \times 10^{-9} cm−2. Lower energy ⟹ larger cross section (∝1/E2\propto 1/E^2) ⟹ ~2.6× the 2020 value — check limiting cases like this in the exam.

2023 · MSCH-102

What is k-electron capture? "For positron decay the required energy will be greater than 1.02 MeV." — Explain this statement.

K-electron capture: a proton-rich nucleus captures one of its own K-shell electrons (K-shell has the largest wavefunction overlap with the nucleus): p+eK−→n+νep + e^-_K \to n + \nu_e. No β-particle is emitted; the K-vacancy is filled by an outer electron, giving characteristic X-rays (or Auger electrons). With atomic masses the electron masses cancel exactly, QEC=[Matom(Z,A)−Matom(Z−1,A)]c2Q_{EC} = [M_{atom}(Z,A) - M_{atom}(Z-1,A)]c^2 — no threshold penalty. The 1.02 MeV statement: β+ decay must create a positron (mₑ) while the daughter atom also sheds one electron, costing 2mₑc2 = 1.022 MeV (derived in the 2022 card). So a nucleus with 0<ΔMc2<1.0220 < \Delta Mc^2 < 1.022 MeV can decay only by electron capture — e.g. 7Be^{7}\mathrm{Be} (0.87 MeV). EC always competes with β+ and dominates at low Q.

2023 · MSCH-102electron: asked 6×

Considering the particle nature of electron, justify that electron cannot be situated inside the nucleus.

Particle-in-a-box: confining the electron's position to Δx∼10−14\Delta x \sim 10^{-14} m makes its momentum uncertain by Δp≳ℏ/2Δx≈5.3×10−21\Delta p \gtrsim \hbar/2\Delta x \approx 5.3 \times 10^{-21} kg m s−1, i.e. a kinetic energy E≈pc≈10E \approx pc \approx 10 MeV. No β-decay releases anywhere near that (endpoints are ~0.5–3 MeV), and a 10 MeV electron would have been seen long ago. Hence the electron cannot pre-exist inside the nucleus.

2023 · MSCH-102

Show that for a spherically symmetric nucleus, electric quadrupole moment is zero. When and how does a nucleus exhibit a non-zero quadrupole moment? (Right edge of the scan was cropped; question reconstructed from the readable portion.)

Proof: Q=1e∫(3z2−r2)ρ dτQ = \tfrac{1}{e}\int(3z^2 - r^2)\rho\,d\tau. Spherical symmetry ⟹ ⟨x2⟩=⟨y2⟩=⟨z2⟩=⟨r2⟩/3\langle x^2\rangle = \langle y^2\rangle = \langle z^2\rangle = \langle r^2\rangle/3, so 3⟨z2⟩−⟨r2⟩=03\langle z^2\rangle - \langle r^2\rangle = 0 and the integral vanishes — Q = 0 exactly. Non-zero Q appears when the nucleus is permanently deformed: for a uniform ellipsoid, Q=25Z(a2−b2)Q = \tfrac{2}{5}Z(a^2-b^2) — prolate (cigar, a>ba > b) gives Q > 0, oblate (disc, a<ba < b) gives Q < 0. Measured Q values (e.g. large positive Q in the rare-earth region) are direct evidence of deformation. (Full derivation: §3, D5.)

2023 · MSCH-102asked 2×

What is the difference between X-ray and γ-ray?

Origin, not energy: X-rays come from electron rearrangements (inner-shell vacancies, bremsstrahlung — keV range); γ-rays come from nuclear de-excitation (keV–MeV). Same electromagnetic radiation, different birthplace. See the 2020 comparison table.

2023 · MSCH-102

Describe the nature of different nuclear forces.

Eight points, one line each: short-ranged (~1–2 fm, Yukawa e−μr/re^{-\mu r}/r); strongly attractive (~50× Coulomb at 1 fm); saturating (nearest neighbours only ⟹ constant density, B∝AB \propto A); charge-independent (p–p ≈ n–n ≈ p–n); spin-dependent (triplet binds the deuteron, singlet doesn't); repulsive core below ~0.5 fm; tensor (non-central) component; exchange character — meson (pion) exchange, Yukawa 1935. (Expanded in §2.11.)

2024 · MSCH-102fission block: asked 2 yrs running

What is nuclear fission?

Fission is the splitting of a heavy nucleus into two lighter fragments (plus neutrons and γ-rays), e.g. 235U+n→236U∗→141Ba+92Kr+3n^{235}\mathrm{U} + n \to ^{236}\mathrm{U}^* \to ^{141}\mathrm{Ba} + ^{92}\mathrm{Kr} + 3n. It is exoergic (~200 MeV) because the fragments sit higher on the B/A curve than the parent (§2.7). Discovered by Hahn–Strassmann (1938), explained by Meitner–Frisch with the liquid-drop picture — the drop deforms, necks, and snaps.

2024 · MSCH-102fission block: asked 2 yrs running

How is energy harnessed by fission reaction?

The ~200 MeV per fission appears mostly as kinetic energy of the fragments (~168 MeV), which thermalises in the fuel as heat; add neutron (~5 MeV) and prompt-γ (~7 MeV) heating plus decay heat (~15 MeV from the fragments' β/γ decay). A coolant carries this heat to a heat exchanger → steam → turbine → electricity. The reaction sustains itself because each fission emits 2–3 neutrons (chain reaction, held at k = 1 by control rods). ~11 MeV per fission escapes as neutrinos — unrecoverable.

2024 · MSCH-102fission block: asked 2 yrs running

Sketch a neat diagram of nuclear reactor, narrating the functions of each component.

Schematic of a nuclear reactor Cross-section of a reactor: concrete shield outside, steel pressure vessel inside, core containing fuel rods and control rods in moderator, with coolant entering cold at the bottom and leaving hot at the top. concrete shield (biological) steel pressure vessel core: fuel + moderator control rods coolant in (cold) coolant out (hot) fuel rods (²³⁵U / ²³⁹Pu) — fission heat source moderator (H₂O/D₂O/graphite) — thermalises neutrons
Reactor schematic. Chain reaction in the fuel → heat → coolant → steam → power.
ComponentFunction
Fuel (235U^{235}\mathrm{U}, 239Pu^{239}\mathrm{Pu} as UO2 pellets in cladding)Undergoes fission; source of neutrons and ~200 MeV per fission as heat
Moderator (H2O, D2O, graphite)Slows fast neutrons to thermal energies where fission σ is huge
Control rods (Cd, B4C, Hf)Absorb neutrons; hold k = 1, scram the reactor in emergency
Coolant (H2O, He, liquid Na)Carries heat from core to steam generator
Pressure vessel + concrete shieldContains high-pressure coolant; shield absorbs neutrons and γ-rays
2024 · MSCH-102

"There is no stable odd-odd nucleus after 14N^{14}\mathrm{N}". — Justify the statement.

The only stable odd-odd nuclei in nature are 2H^{2}\mathrm{H}, 6Li^{6}\mathrm{Li}, 10B^{10}\mathrm{B} and 14N^{14}\mathrm{N}. For even A the pairing term splits isobars into two mass parabolas (Fig. 2, §5): even-even on the lower, odd-odd on the upper, separated by 2δ2\delta. An odd-odd nucleus therefore always has an even-even isobaric neighbour of lower mass on one side or the other, and β-decays (β− or β+/EC) into it. Beyond A = 14 the Coulomb-plus-asymmetry parabolas are steep enough that this is unavoidable — every heavier odd-odd isobar is stranded on the upper parabola with a downhill path. 14N^{14}\mathrm{N} survives only because at A = 14 the parabolas are shallow and shell effects intervene.

2024 · MSCH-102asked 3×

Why is (4n+1) series called artificial series?

The neptunium series' longest-lived member, 237Np^{237}\mathrm{Np} (t1/2=2.1×106t_{1/2} = 2.1 \times 10^6 yr), is far too short-lived to have survived since Earth's formation — unlike the 238U^{238}\mathrm{U}, 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} and 232Th^{232}\mathrm{Th} series parents. It exists today only when synthesised artificially. See the full 2020 answer.

2024 · MSCH-102

Mention the stability order: (i) 40Ar18^{40}\mathrm{Ar}_{18}, 40K19^{40}\mathrm{K}_{19}, 40Ca20^{40}\mathrm{Ca}_{20}; (ii) 6He2^{6}\mathrm{He}_{2}, 6Li3^{6}\mathrm{Li}_{3}, 6Be4^{6}\mathrm{Be}_{4}.

Stability ⟺ lowest mass. Atomic masses: 40Ar=39.962383^{40}\mathrm{Ar} = 39.962383 u, 40Ca=39.962591^{40}\mathrm{Ca} = 39.962591 u, 40K=39.963998^{40}\mathrm{K} = 39.963998 u.

(i) A = 40 is even: ⁴⁰Ar and ⁴⁰Ca are even-even (lower parabola — both stable), ⁴⁰K is odd-odd (upper parabola — unstable, β− to Ca and EC to Ar, t½ = 1.25×109 yr). Order: ⁴⁰Ar ≥ ⁴⁰Ca ≫ ⁴⁰K — Ar is the absolute minimum by 0.0002 u (≈ 0.19 MeV), a subtlety; the exam point is that the even-even pair both beat the odd-odd member. (Naive parabola minimum Z0=40/(2+0.015×402/3)=18.4Z_0 = 40/(2+0.015 \times 40^{2/3}) = 18.4 also favours Ar; Ca's near-degeneracy reflects its Z = 20 magic number.)

(ii) 6Li=6.015123^{6}\mathrm{Li} = 6.015123 u < 6He=6.018889^{6}\mathrm{He} = 6.018889 u < 6Be=6.019726^{6}\mathrm{Be} = 6.019726 u ⟹ ⁶Li > ⁶He > ⁶Be. Only ⁶Li is stable: ⁶He β−-decays (t½ ≈ 0.8 s) and ⁶Be is proton-unbound (falls apart to α + 2p essentially instantly). ⁶Li is the odd-odd exception at light A (like ²H, ¹⁰B, ¹⁴N), where the parabolas are shallow; the "no stable odd-odd" rule bites only past ¹⁴N.

2024 · MSCH-102

What is the closest distance of approach of an alpha particle of energy 5.5 MeV to a gold nucleus (Z = 79)?

Head-on: dmin=kZ1Z2e2/E=1.44×2×79/5.5=41.4d_{min} = kZ_1Z_2e^2/E = 1.44 \times 2 \times 79/5.5 = 41.4 fm =4.14×10−14= 4.14 \times 10^{-14} m — about 6× the touching distance (8.9 fm), so the scattering is purely Coulombic. (Full steps in §4, Example 4.)

2024 · MSCH-102electron: asked 6×

Considering the wave nature of electron, show that electron cannot be situated inside the nucleus.

An electron confined to Δx∼10−14\Delta x \sim 10^{-14} m has Δp≳ℏ/2Δx\Delta p \gtrsim \hbar/2\Delta x, i.e. E≈pc≈10E \approx pc \approx 10 MeV — or in wave language, a β-decay electron's de Broglie wavelength (~870 fm at 1 MeV) dwarfs the nucleus. Both contradict measured β-energies (≤ ~3 MeV). No resident electron; β-particles are created at decay. (Full numbers in the 2020 card.)

2024 · MSCH-102asked 4×

Why is threshold energy for positron emission equal to 2mₑ?

Using atomic masses, Qβ+=[Matom(Z,A)−Matom(Z−1,A)−2me]c2Q_{\beta^+} = [M_{atom}(Z,A) - M_{atom}(Z-1,A) - 2m_e]c^2: one mₑ for the created positron, one for the electron the daughter atom sheds. Positron emission needs the atomic-mass difference to exceed 2mₑc2 = 1.022 MeV. (Full derivation in the 2022 card.)

2024 · MSCH-102

Define primordial nucleus with example.

A primordial nuclide is one that has existed since before Earth's formation — i.e. with a half-life comparable to the age of the Earth (~109 yr), so a measurable fraction survives today. Examples: 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} (t1/2=4.5×109t_{1/2} = 4.5 \times 10^9 yr), 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} (7.0×108 yr), 232Th^{232}\mathrm{Th} (1.4×1010 yr), 40K^{40}\mathrm{K} (1.25×109 yr). (This is also why the 4n+1 series is "artificial" — its parent is not primordial.)

7 Exam Q&A

Q1. State the nuclear radius law and the value of R₀.

R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, R0≈1.2R_0 \approx 1.2 fm. Consequence: volume ∝ A, density constant (~1017 kg m−3).

Q2. Which SEMF term stops nuclei growing without limit?

The Coulomb term −acZ(Z−1)/A1/3-a_cZ(Z-1)/A^{1/3}: the only long-range, non-saturating term — it grows as Z2Z^2 while cohesion grows only as A.

Q3. Odd-A isobars: one mass parabola or two? Why?

One — the pairing term vanishes for all odd-A nuclei, so there is no even-even/odd-odd split. Only the minimum-Z isobar is stable.

Q4. Q > 0 vs Q < 0 — what does each mean operationally?

Q > 0: exoergic — proceeds spontaneously, excess appears as kinetic energy. Q < 0: endoergic — needs projectile energy above threshold Ethr=−Q(1+m/M)E_{thr} = -Q(1+m/M).

Q5. Define the barn.

1 barn=10−28 m2=10−24 cm21\ \mathrm{barn} = 10^{-28}\ \mathrm{m^2} = 10^{-24}\ \mathrm{cm^2} — the unit of nuclear cross section.

Q6. State Bohr's independence hypothesis in one line.

The decay of a compound nucleus depends only on its energy, angular momentum and parity — not on how it was formed.

Q7. What do the Schmidt lines predict, and what do deviations mean?

They give the magnetic moment of an odd-A nucleus from its last nucleon (two lines: j=l±1/2j = l \pm 1/2, separate for odd-p/odd-n). Real moments falling between the lines signal configuration mixing beyond the single-particle picture.

Q8. A nucleus has Q = +0.3 b. Prolate or oblate?

Prolate (cigar-shaped) — Q > 0 means elongation along the spin axis; Q < 0 would be oblate.

Q9. Why does 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} fission with thermal neutrons while 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} needs fast ones?

Neutron capture on the odd-N 235U^{235}\mathrm{U} makes even-even 236U∗^{236}\mathrm{U}^* — the extra pairing gain puts its excitation above the fission barrier; capture on even-even 238U^{238}\mathrm{U} makes odd-N 239U∗^{239}\mathrm{U}^* with excitation below the barrier, so the neutron must bring extra kinetic energy.

Q10. Give the fissility parameter and the Bohr–Wheeler limit.

Z2/A measures Coulomb disruption vs surface cohesion; the fission barrier vanishes at Z2/A≈48Z^2/A \approx 48 — beyond it, spontaneous fission.

8 Quick revision

Boxed results — the whole chapter on one screen

  • Radius: R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, R0≈1.2R_0 \approx 1.2 fm; ρ≈2.3×1017\rho \approx 2.3 \times 10^{17} kg m−3 (constant — saturation).
  • Binding energy: B=[Zmp+(A−Z)mn−M]c2B = [Zm_p + (A-Z)m_n - M]c^2; B/A peaks ≈ 8.8 MeV at A ≈ 56.
  • SEMF (1): volume avAa_vA − surface asA2/3a_sA^{2/3} − Coulomb acZ(Z−1)/A1/3a_cZ(Z-1)/A^{1/3} − asymmetry asym(A−2Z)2/Aa_{sym}(A-2Z)^2/A ± pairing δ=12A−1/2\delta = 12A^{-1/2} MeV; (15.75, 17.8, 0.71, 23.7).
  • Most stable isobar (2): Z0≈A/(2+0.015A2/3)Z_0 \approx A/(2 + 0.015A^{2/3}); odd A: one parabola; even A: two (even-even lower by 2δ).
  • Q-value (3): Q=(mreactants−mproducts)c2Q = (m_{reactants} - m_{products})c^2; β+ threshold 2mₑc2 = 1.022 MeV.
  • Rutherford (4): dσ/dΩ=(Z1Z2e2/16πε0E)2csc⁡4(θ/2)d\sigma/d\Omega = (Z_1Z_2e^2/16\pi\varepsilon_0E)^2\csc^4(\theta/2); head-on (5): dmin=Z1Z2e2/4πε0Ed_{min} = Z_1Z_2e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0E; ke2=1.44ke^2 = 1.44 MeV·fm.
  • Quadrupole (6): Q=1e∫(3z2−r2)ρ dτQ = \tfrac{1}{e}\int(3z^2-r^2)\rho\,d\tau; spherical ⟹ 0; ellipsoid Q=25Z(a2−b2)Q = \tfrac{2}{5}Z(a^2-b^2): prolate > 0, oblate < 0.
  • Schmidt: odd-p μ=l+2.79\mu = l+2.79 / l−2.79l/(l+1)l-2.79l/(l+1); odd-n μ=−1.91\mu = -1.91 / +1.91l/(l+1)+1.91l/(l+1) for j=l±1/2j = l\pm1/2 (in μN\mu_N).
  • Compound nucleus: formation and decay independent (Bohr); resonances in σ(E).
  • Fission: ~200 MeV per fission; fissility Z2/A; barrier vanishes ≈ 48.
  • Electron in nucleus: impossible — needs ~10 MeV vs β-endpoints ~1 MeV.
  • (4n+1) = artificial (237Np^{237}\mathrm{Np} too short-lived); no stable odd-odd beyond 14N^{14}\mathrm{N}.

Symbols

SymbolMeaningSymbolMeaning
Z,A,NZ, A, Nprotons, nucleons, neutronsσcross section (barn = 10−28 m2)
Bbinding energybimpact parameter
Qreaction Q-value or quadrupole moment (context!)IπI^\pispin-parity of a state
δpairing term, ≈12A−1/2\approx 12A^{-1/2} MeVμN\mu_Nnuclear magneton
R0radius constant ≈ 1.2 fmZ2/Afissility parameter